The point I was trying to make is that it is not semantics at all, in fact, it's the opposite. Words do have meaning (unless you're a hardcore deconstructionist, and there are probably very few of those on this forum I suspect) and by your words it really does appear that what you said was that you don't care about the movie, you care about Moore. Which is fine. Repeat: fine. BUT but to then take that statement as a condemnation of the movie is contrary to basic logic. Am I getting it wrong?
So, just to be snarky (
) I'll repeat an earlier question: if "farhenheit 9/11" had been made by Rush Limbaugh but was otherwise exactly identical, would you go see it?
Quote:
Originally posted by Atrocities:
PvK I don't mean to confuse you or any one. I honestly just don't really care to debate sematics or peoples take on what they think was said.
I trust in that people will either accept what I say or will not. If they choose not to then that is fine with me.
When the debate turns south and every word is reflected upon for meaning, that is when I say take it or leave it for whatever you want it to mean.
If you want to break down what I said and try to use it against me well that is your given right and I really could careless.
|