[TerranC]

Long post folks, if you're not interested, just stay clear of this one.

Stephen Harper sings a tune I like on Education, Health Care, Armed Forces etc But the guy scares me on Same Sex Marriage, (not on abortion, I believe him that he wont press that hot button.) Still I dont think he has enough reign on his people to manage them effectively and a lot of his people seem downright RABID.

How so? By saying that Marriage is a union between a man and a woman and that any other deviation is ungodly? Some radical MPs from every party preach that tune; it's just that the Conservatives haven't made tolerance towards metrosexuals official policy.

So I was more than mildly surprised when I discovered I had another REAL alternative. The Green Party. They are hovering somewhere between 7 and 10% of the popular vote AND with every vote they get that places them OVER 2% they get a 1.75 in funding to better portray themselves.

Popular votes don't win seats.

Myself I've read all the platforms and to be honest I was quite surprised at what I found in the Green Party's Platform. They are not about to sack the military (THE NDP wants to phase out all offensive weaponry) Instead they want to reform it into a quick response force that can go just about anywhere to combat terrorism or keep the peace. Sounds reasonable.

From the Green Party's Website:

To refocus Canada’s security capabilities and maximize their effectiveness, the Green Party will create an “International Affairs and Global Security Agency” to coordinate and fund the Department of National Defence, the Canadian International Development Agency and the Department of Foreign Affairs (excluding trade and citizenship). Our international efforts to achieve peace and sustainability can be best attained by coordinating our diplomatic and military capabilities, existing aid and development. Having one agency to coordinate all of our international efforts will maximize our potential contributions.

Yeah, I bet it will.

Create a RRDF that combines the efforts of civilian specialists and diplomats with military units.

Ensure that these units work together, in a coordinated fashion, to protect civilians and eco-systems.

Mix civilians and diplomats with military units to combat terrorism, keep the peace, and protect the environment; That sounds mighty naive to me, and dangerous to bout; we've seen and are seeing civilian contractors, diplomats, and fully-armed solders alike get taken down one by one in Iraq, Afghanistan, and in Saudi Arabia; what makes you think that this RRDF can live up to its goal?

Canada’s security at home should be managed by one department. Search and rescue, coastal patrol, airborne maritime surveillance and disaster assistance would all be coordinated under one roof. A merged and enhanced National Reserve and Coast Guard would share the mission to protect our society from internal and external threats.

There's a reason why the National Reserve and the Coast Guard are separate organizations; it's more efficient when one organization sticks to its job. If the Green Party wants to increase the coast guard's size by cutting a part of the national reserve and merging that part with it, more power to them, but merging to different organizations into one to handle two jobs at once is, IMHO, dangerous.

"When crisis emerges or disaster strikes in any nation, Canadians are deeply moved to provide help. To play a role in international assistance missions, Canada must maintain a large, highly-trained and well-equipped Rapid Response and Deployment Force (RRDF). This will require new investments in long-range strategic air-lift equipment, disaster-relief equipment, state-of-the-art armoured personnel carriers, personal protective equipment and training for our forces."

What?! That doesnt sound 'Green' to me, it actually sounds responsible!

No, that sounds conservative to me.

They also want to use Canada's influence to reorganize NATO (not scrap it like the NDP). Instead of 5 Veto Holders they want 15, 5 of the wealthiest, 5 of the most populous and 5 elected countries to form a larger more rounded security council. I'll be damned if that doesnt sound good too!

You mean the UN security council. And the NDP wanted to scrap NATO in favor of getting a fleet of "6 Aurora Long Range Patrol Aircraft, 12 non-nuclear submarines, 18 frigates, and a fleet of helicopters." This was back in 1987, a good 17 years ago, when Russia was still the USSR. Jack Layton has said that the NDP will commit itself to NATO; and I believe him on this fact; it would seem foolish to reject an organization that offers deterrent against threats abroad. About that 15 nations who would hold veto power in the UN securiy council; how would you measure wealth? GDP per capita? Are you prepared to give Luxembourg and and the Cayman Islands veto power over 200 nations? or perhaps by raw GDP itself; thus letting the US and China retain their vetos, and yet giving Germany and Japan veto power, which would cause unparalleled furour in asia and europe? and by population alone, the world would certainly be alarmed at the fact of Indonesia ganing veto power at this time, should the greens have their way. A security coucil with the US, Germany, Japan, and Luxembourg on one side and with China, Indonesia, the Bermudas and the Cayman Islands one the other plus 5 other nations would certainly create mutual co-operation.

They plan on turfing the wasteful, ineffective GUN REGISTRY as well.

So does every other party, and then some.

They want to implement a balanced set of Tax Cuts and Increases That:

*Raise taxes on harmful activities such as pollution, waste and inefficiency.
*Use tariffs when necessary to discourage unsustainable industries and human rights violations. (READ getting read of things that often end up replacing jobs in CANADA, as sweat shops always will and always do produce faster and cheaper than we will)

You do realize that almost every economic and daily practices (such as cutting down trees for softwood lumber, which I am informed as being one of the most important industries in BC, your home province, and riding a car with a bad muffler) could be considered polluting, don't you? And tariffs to discourage unsustainable industries (which I must assume that they mean the current energy sector by that) and human rights violations? So the Green party would impose taxes each time we import power and gas from the US and abroad, while virtually prohibiting third world products (which I am sure were made in inhygenic factories in god-knows-where) from reaching our shores by taxing them? And expect the Canadian economy to fuction and grow all the while?

They also take a strong stance on Health Care providing incentive for Canadians to eat Healthier and excercise (which I think most of us will admit has a lot to do with the strain on our health care). All of this means that they will actually take the helm on the problem not just throw more money and a ailing system. They also plan on reducing pollution and cleaning up water (again who else does that?).

High praise for a party that would more or less advocate euthanasia.

The Green Party will:
Reduce the long hours that Canadians are working.

Advocate for more time spent engaging in outdoor activities.

Work to decrease the pollution that is weakening our immune systems.

Work to reduce overstress, which is a leading cause of health problems.

Respect the rights of the terminally ill to refuse treatment.

The one thing that scares me but probably makes others happy is the plan to reduce the standard work week for all canadians (stress=poor health). If they can pull that one off i'd love it, dunno how it can be done tho!

You and me both. Although I expect it'll go down in flames once everybody starts to take advantage of it.

All in all the Green party platform (to me) seems the most comprehensive. I really get the feeling of a party that intends to govern Canada as if it was a life long job, not a 4 year term before we have to worry about it again (screw around for 3 years and then make false promises for 1 year).

They do have that effect on people, don't they?

btw prior to this i'm usually a staunch conservitive (because of economics not right wing views). I'm a supporter of what Klein did in Alberta, but a detractor of what Campbell does in BC (not as bad as his NDP predecessors tho).

In all fairness, Klein managed to pull it off because the odds were on his side; Gas, a market for Gas, and at the time when Klein was first elected, a rising price trend for gas. Not all provinces can be expected to pull off the "Klein Formula".

All quotes taken from the Green Party Website: http://www.greenparty.ca/platform2004/en/index.php?p

Edit: bad grammar edited

[ June 19, 2004, 22:10: Message edited by: TerranC ]