"Vacuum"? Ok, it ain't me.
That's encouraging.
My ship naming scheme is so simple achild could understand it. (standard USN scheme, really)
What I meant by the warp point/fleet movement thing was written too fast to be clear: I closed a WP that I thought we had discussed as one you wanted closing.
In a *separate* issue, I have also been moving some fleets around, so I could envision a situation where they took the "shortest route" to their destinations - and that might have taken them over your planets.
It looks like that is not what happened. Now, I may still have screwed up by closing the WP, but it's clear that it wasn't a backstab. "Vacuum" - bah, who names their ships Vacuum?
Quote:
Originally posted by Slynky:
Well, sachmo, not sure what you mean but I'm talking to alarikf offline now. alarikf's message is a bit confusing, especially this part, "...cause he thought you wanted that WP removed and he told his ships to travel to waypoint X...which happened to take them through that system...". One can't move to a warp point and then close it. You have to be sitting on it at the beginning of the turn. As to traveling, the fleet I suspect of doing it didn't travel for 2 turns.
But, recognizing I could have the wrong idea who did it, I'm discussing it with alarikf now. But the fleet in question has a single ship there where the hole disappeared named "Vaccuum". Might just be a fluke. I'll find out before I take any stupid action.
|