[DeadZone]

Originally posted by Imperator Fyron:

quote:

---

Personally I dont have a problem with the graphics, I think I may actually be the only 19 yr old who doesnt care about graphics when its comes to games

Think again buddy.

---

Of course, how could I forget you Fyron

Needless to say, too many ppl base a game on its graphics and as companies are now looking into only making a game look good the game play and lifeline of games are now bcoming Pathetic

I shall dare to give an example

EA Sports
Fifa football
The fist fifa games I played was fifa95 for the mega drive, rally good enjoyable game
Then I played 97, improvement on graphics but played not as well
Then I got a Playstation, first game I got for it was Fifa 99, Great graphics, fantastic game play
Then Fifa 2000, played that, wot a disappointment that was, gameplay had gone down the drain completely IMO and PS2 fifa releases had the same problem, and it put me off of any game made by EA Sports

Then earlier this month, I thought I would give them another chance and brought Fifa 2003 for the Gamecube
And all I can say is that they got their act together, needless to say I think it was the first time, since I got broadband year ago August that, I didnt go on my computer for a week

Now I know these are console games and not PC, but the same rules apply, EA had started to rush out products which caused crap games even tho thy looked cool, then they got their act together and now are producing games that look good and play good, BUT THEN, they do own Westwood studios, which is the best computer graphics stuidios in th world, so you should expect their games too look good anyway, and now they are utilizing their ppl properly their games have vastly improved, but also they hav the advantage that the publish their own games so they work to their own timescale

Now SF, dont have all these luxuries, so we shouldnt expect a brilliant game, and perhaps if the game was given a few extra months when the project came to be, then things would have been diff.