[Pocus]

Originally posted by PvK:
You were quoting Jasper, who was talking about Hoplites vs. Hyps, as the rest of us were, further down the thread.

As for Arco or Ulm being boring in either game... I've had lots of fun with both and don't find them boring. Arco has five types of melee infantry, three types of cavalry, plus fun chariots and elephants, very nice priestesses and magicians and astrologers... Ulm is really fun for trying to squash magic with heavy metal, and for trying to keep an elite corps alive in the face of huge resource costs to raise troops.

I think it's really a matter of personal preference, which is why it's good there are so many varied choices for nations.

PvK

Sorry to nickpick, but I didnt quote Jasper in first instance. He initially quoted a post of mine were I spoke of doms I Hysps versus doms II hysps. The post of Jasper I'm refering too is the one posted at 13:38.

So back to the point of my initial post :
I was dealing with the fact the Hysps in dom I were at 8 resources, compared to hysps of doms II at 18 resources. The difference being only 4 in defence between the two (and here too I'm speaking of doms I hysps at 11 def versus doms II hysps at 15 def).

Hope it clarifies.

[ October 30, 2003, 18:23: Message edited by: Pocus ]