
November 3rd, 2003, 10:37 PM
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Nuts-Land, counting them.
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Did you noticed.......
Quote:
Originally posted by ywl:
But the original argument still stands, you can always double the richness.
|
you know as me that the standard settings will be more often than not adopted in PBEM.
Quote:
Or as another suggested, another improvement will be to seperate the Gold and Resource settings and allow finer tune.
|
yes I would like that, I think it is SC which posted (as in Saber Cherry, not Super Combattant...). Otherwise, with so much resources, the bias versus heavy units would be even greater. So rich settings ok, but only for gold then.
Quote:
I also find the new "Order" scale forces me to make some painful (but good for gameplay) tradeoff. To raise income, I need order but I'll have less beneficial random events. Some of these events are very significant, I've got a Lore Master and a Stalker (the ethereal assassain). I hate to lose them because of a +3 order .
|
quite true, some events are really crunchy. I got a visit from an astral council too.
[ November 03, 2003, 20:42: Message edited by: Pocus ]
__________________
Currently playing: Dominions III, Civilization IV, Ageod American Civil War.
|