[Crowley]

Originally posted by Gandalf Parker:
I thought it was already this way. If not then I heartily agree. Even in provinces with no castle. If I have an enemy coming toward me I should have a reason to select between defend or patrol. I already know the reasons for patrol. I thought defend meant a slightly higher response-combat ability.

What makes more sense to you:

Defending, hunkering down in one small place and always catch the attacker.

Patroling, moving around the big freak providence and having a better chance at attacking/spoting a moving army.


It makes no sense to have the defend option catch attackers while patrol doesnt.