Re: Random Events
Saber:
Perhaps I am especially dense today, but I still can't follow your argument. Let's see if we can't pin down where my problem lies. I'm more comfortable with the way Licker stated things, so tell me whether or not you agree with the following:
Luck Scale %chance of bad event
+3 20
+2 30
+1 40
0 50
-1 60
-2 70
-3 80
And if you do agree that this is the way it works,is your argument then that going from luck +2 to luck +3 reduces the chance of a bad event by 1/3 but going from luck -2 to luck -3 only increases the chance by 1/7?
I apologise for the format - when I type it out its a nice clear table, but for some reason the board refuses to post it that way.
[ November 18, 2003, 22:50: Message edited by: Truper ]
|