[Keir Maxwell]

Originally posted by Zapmeister:
I recall reading that their targeting is worse in Dom2, and losses to friendly fire is hard to avoid. So, is there any point at all in recruiting these guys? I'm not talking about crossbowmen here, just shortbowmen and longbowmen.

It depends. In general I'm not a fan of archers - I don't like killing my own troops - however there are times they are great.

Longbows are good for fast expansion with little or no loses - HI on hold and attack just in front of longbow.

Shortbow are fast to build and when you need a boost right then and there they are damn handy. 2 resource Machakan shortbow have filled a few holes for me. They also slaughter Serpent Dancers and I'm sure there other light armoured things you will have to worry about.

But all going well I won't use much bow or Xbow outside a race with a superior Version at the start - Marignon Xbow in Dom I and Man Longbow, might be others now. Placing the archers complicates placing mages as the Archers are valid targets - though you can make use of this. Targeting is crap and longbow or Xbow (the best Versions) will kill/wound your own super troops when pursuing.

I don't think the game depicts archers well. Targeting is both too easy and too inaccurate. Ranges seem odd in relation to the width armies deploy over and the speed troops move. Shorter ranges and greater accuracy could solve alot of problems. Archers are hard to get right both in computer games and tabletop wargames.

So sometimes yes and sometimes no, but I don't like archers and Xbow.

cheers

Keir