December 19th, 2003, 11:36 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 1,375
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Is growth scale must in a long game?
Quote:
Originally posted by aldin:
Mebbe, and I think 20 is an awfully high taxpayer age for a medievalish time-frame, but it'd be easy enough for the event to reflect something that happened in the past:
"Under the influence of the stars, fourteen years ago every woman in this province gave birth to twins."
Frankly, I like the other way better. You can imply either:
a) The effect is felt today from the event being reported.
-or-
b) There's some sort of 'baby tax' that parents pay.
The idea remains valid however you put it though.
~Aldin
|
Those are good ideas, although an event being recorded and then reported 14 years after... thats kinda..  |