[Zapmeister]

Hmmm. Is there really much to be gained by reducing a fabulous advantage to a merely huge advantage?

I think players will always be forced to decide whether or not they trust their host, and whether or not they want to play in games run by a potentially untrustworthy host.

It is, after all, just a game. What's the point of winning if you secretly exploited your role as host to do it? None that I can see.