| 
			
			 
			
				March 24th, 2004, 07:19 PM
			
			
			
		 | 
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Corporal |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Pembrokeshire, Wales 
						Posts: 86
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
			
		
	      |  | 
    
	| 
				 Re: to be named later (probably READ THIS BEFORE POSTING) 
 
	Well, it now seems to be tackling the question of the nature of truth, and can you 'know' something that is false, which isn't exactly semantics even if it isn't original either.Quote: 
	
		| Originally posted by Peter Ebbesen: That tread really ought to be named "futile debate on semantics"
 |  
 So maybe just "flame roasted (philosophical) chestnuts" - if "chestnut" in this context isn't too idiomatic for an international forum.
 
 And yes, I know I am guilty. I'm sowwwy.
   
 Links to suggested startegies (
  ) for the different nations would be a very welcome addition to the list.
				__________________Thtrap it to the bench and put a good thick bolt of lightning through it, that'th our motto.  That'th how you tetht thomething!
 -   Igor
 |