[johan osterman]

Originally posted by Norfleet:
That's usually the case when a knee-jerk reaction occurs as a result of a public outcry of whining. This is why I feel that whenever somebody calls for a nerfing of anything, that somebody should generally be ignored. Now the VQ is a more or less completely unusable chassis by any nation that doesn't have a huge number of points to burn...and isn't available to the most noteworthy, and perhaps appropriate, of them: Ermor. Meanwhile, other options are no more attractive than they were before. Instead of more and better options, we have less. To top that off, the new patch didn't really give us anything new, contentwise. Bleh.

The intention was to price the VQ so that she would be as (un)viable as the liches. If you compared their costs before the VQ was a better choice than the standard- or Saurolich in almost every conceivable situation. Perhaps Liches are not very popular but they have been priced this way since dom 1 days and the VQ was added for dom 2, so our feeling was that the VQ was the pretender that was priced wrong rather than the liches. It was not a knee jerk reaction, especially since the VQ complaints emerged well before the previous patch, it was a measured response, and we didn't start fiddling with the VQ until we one day compared the lich with the VQ point by point, that was the reason for the change not the whining. We are not pavlov dogs. The removal of the VQ from Ermor is the sole instance where I might concede some part of your point, but even there it was mainly done for thematic reasons.