View Single Post
  #6  
Old June 5th, 2001, 02:57 PM
Mordante's Avatar

Mordante Mordante is offline
Private
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: brighton
Posts: 32
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mordante is on a distinguished road
Default Re: The Face of the Enemy (Destroy this Ship!)

1) Nullspace cannons; in my experience they are very solid weapons in the mid game where a heavy mount can actually do serious damage against a lean cruiser design. 3 turn reloads are not a problem when you cripple with the first volley. Also, have you seen the damage resistance of a massive nullspace mount? - 250ish - ironically means that a massive nullspace mount is amongst the best way to soak nullspace or shield-skipping damage.

Negatives; if your ships are slower then you could be screwed by the opponent using max-range strategy and longer weapons. Or perhaps flooding the field with small disposable vessels. Economically, the radiactive costs of mass null-space building is vast - can be a big problem. A nullspace equipped base ship is amongst the most expensive vessel in the game outside of steller manipulation - takes a long time to build and a lot to maintain.

2) mines and selective intelligence hits vs minesweepers; nice combo - any hints as to the best way of knocking down 100,000 pts of counter-intel? (I have 200,000 pts of intel available)

3) Wave cannons - I am dubious about these, the 3 turn reload and massive cost seem a disinincentive - for the space and cost you could mount multiple anti-protons or shard cannons and fire every turn. I suspect that in a big fleet battle the strategic AI will not be able to dance reloading ships out of enemy weapon range so the reload cycle will kill.

4) Suicide borders .... now that i like *grins* appeals to the spirit of heroism of my empire. Couple of shield depleters per border maybe and pack the rest out with troops ... interesting results.

5) Economic war, I have more or less concluded that the only way to fight no-maintenance is to go for a very high direct attrition combat; looking for as many damaging engagements as possible to cause maximum casualties (hopefully his) Hence my quest for a "Tyrant"-killer design.

Thanks for ideas so far, please keep them rolling in.

I will probably write-up the results of this clash of arms as a narrative/combat guide document.

Regards
__________________
he who has relied least on fortune is established the strongest

Nicoló Machiavelli
Reply With Quote