Quote:
Vynd said:
Yeah, but that's no excuse not to review and potentially change the routing system, which I also believe is very goofy and non-intuitive.
|
I could not agree more. This whole idea of a lone commander who will not rout just because he has no troops is completely bogus. The absence or presence of troops ought to make no difference. When a commander becomes fatigued and gets hit, he should rout. Period. In fact, it really ought to be HARDER to prevent routing with no troops rather than EASIER. After all, he is all alone and therefore should rout at the slightest provacation.