Quote:
Graeme Dice said:
Do you mean 2W2S?
|
No, I mean 4W. The reason for this is if you change it to 2W2S, then it limits it to a few nations, that can still clam as easily as they did before. And give them what would seem to be an advantage (not that there is).
With 4W, every nation can use them that can get 2W and forge some boosters, which is pricy. Or if you summon a Sea King, a Water Bracelet. The idea behind this is to limit the non-siteproducing gem income to something that you pay a dear price for. Like I said, it might be overkill, but that's what I think most people who don't like Clams/Fetishes/Bloodstones are looking for, overkill. It could just be an easy fix and remove all 3. Then there would be no non-site income. But that would then bring up the issue of 'madcastling' to protect gem economy? Or some other issue, I'm sure.
Quote:
This seems to be very severely overpriced, and would also have the side-effect of almost denying them to Machaka. The other prices seem to be about in line, but I would bring wraith swords down to death 3 probably.
|
See above for the overpriced bit. Perhaps it could be changed to 3N1F or something similiar. There is a reason that I haven't released the Mod yet, because I'm still seeing what nations are able and how fast the exponential growth curve on the new costs would be.