Re: Dragon*Con Photos (and comments)
The "ours" was merely a manner of speaking. Our little association does have such Assassins, hence the use of the possessive pronoun "ours". I do not have one Assassin at my disposal however, did not contract this Assassin I never heard of, and cannot possibly know that this Assassin (whose very existence remains a mystery to me) is female, let alone that she was available for employment. As such, I could not ask your head to this Assassin I have no knowledge of, even if I had wanted to (perish the thought!).
Alas, there can be no such rule to the standard guideline of Assassins, and so you will be no exception to the cold blade of these lethal killers unbeknowst to me. However, I could likely rescind this order I never gave; to do so, you but have to manage to find the adress of the lovely person displayed in Slynky's first teaser. Once you have done so, I will gladly remove any non-existant contract from your head.
The Tiger can never begin acting in a serene manner, unlike my peaceloving self. I will grant you that he did mention chastity belts and the like, but why should such... erh... devices regarded as being "peaceful"? To the best of my knowledge, the Tiger did not even hinted at what purposes he had in mind. As such, I discard any such thing as a Tiger being peaceful; at best, it is hearsay, and at worst a full-blown conspiracy to tarnish his name.
Edit: Obviously, the moment I post my query, I manage to get the answer on Google at long Last. Tsk. (For the curious reader, this side note was about Liddy and the Watergate, as Geo mentioned both one hundred Posts below)
|