View Single Post
  #147  
Old October 6th, 2004, 03:53 PM
archaeolept's Avatar

archaeolept archaeolept is offline
Lieutenant General
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,687
Thanks: 20
Thanked 54 Times in 39 Posts
archaeolept is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Pangeya is missing

lol storm, you are the one spoiling the game by quitting in this "no quitters" game. As far as i can tell, you have not even made the littlest effort to find a sub, and would rather that the game go to hell due to your fit of pique that is really just motivated by your losing position - a position that you find yourself in purely due to your poor play, especially as to attempting diplomatic hardball w/ both me and quant.

I would recommend that you not play games against players who might beat you.

Since I've already repudiated the joint victory I had proposed to quantum, and that this joint victory was just to avoid a long and tedious endgame, you are left w/ nary a leg to stand on as to your supposed rationale for quitting. the truth is you can't bear to lose, and would rather kick up a huge sh*t storm than admit to it.

As to your math, it is attrocious as usual.
Quote:
Storm posted:
Your math has nothing to do with reality.
yet you list 6 SCs. at that time I would have had 5 IDs (not counting mr. icicle fists) 5 ADs, one demon lord, and a pretender outfitted, or almost so, as SCs. As well, I would have had a king of elemental fire and father illearth way back in my lines being used as forgers (hence, SC chassis's, though not currently usable as SC's), and one sucky heliophagus used as a scout, since it seemed too dangerous to send him against PD

Let me see. that gives me 12 SC's, 14 including chassis's. How is that "10 times" the number of SC's you had (admitted to 6, not counting large numbers of mini-SC van thugs). how is 12, or even 14, this 10 times 6 storm? please explain.

more of your creative math:
Quote:
As I said you were leading in *all* graphs when you offered that "alliance victory" option to qunatum, except my slight lead in provinces and gold income
this is just absurd. ignoring army size, which is basically useless (though I was ahead, it included large amounts of national troops and imps), right before the war when i made the alliance w/ Quantum you were significantly ahead in provinces and gold, tied in dominion, ahead in castles. I was only ahead of you in research and gems. This is easy enough for anyone w/ a single eye to see from the graphs. you were ahead in 3, tied in 1, and i was ahead in 3 (including army size). You are so desperate that you are reduced to pure confabulation and outright fabrication of reasons.

If you must be a baby and go home crying to mommy, pls at least find a substitute. I'm sure quantum and I would be happy to completely change the diplomatic situation w/ a different, less whiny, player.
Reply With Quote