Quote:
Will said:
What Kerry was going to do to decrease the deficit was to repeal the tax cuts for the upper brackets ($200,000+ yearly income)...
|
I recently read this in "The Economist":
Quote:
On the domestic side, Mr Kerry would repeal Mr Bush's tax cuts for people earning more than $200,000 a year. But he proposes to keep the middle-class tax cuts. The overall effect would be to cut taxes by $600 billion over ten years compared with the current position. That is still less than the sum of the reductions Mr Bush is proposing, and Mr Kerry plans to spend all -or possibly more than all- the difference on health care. In simple terms, he poses a clear domestic choice in the election: do you want more tax cuts or more health care?
|
It seems to me that based on campaign rhetoric, Kerry would have done no better than Bush in cutting the deficit. However, in all honesty, Kerry, if he had been elected into office, would probably not go so far as what he promised on the campaign trail and saved more money. The same issue of The Economist included a poll of 100 academic economists and concluded:
Quote:
Although Americans overall seem relatively unconcerned about the budget deficit, a large majority of the economists rate it as a serious problem for the economy, with almost one in five describing it as a crisis. And they back Mr Kerry by a large margin (79% to 18%) to do more to promote fiscal discipline than Mr Bush.
|