Quote:
SCAJolly said:
It has struck me that someone experienced, and who might have some insight on the topic in question, could write their articles on Wikipedia, yeah. At least more insight than one who denies a possibility without really supporting that denial with facts.
|
Experienced in readmitting faulty articles to Wikipedia ad nauseum?
Oh please...
The essays on Wikipedia are open source and can be edited at will, being stubborn and resubmitting your view is what makes articles survive there, not being "experienced"
FAS is unreliable at best, and is essentially a bunch of website claims gathered into one page, some even seemingly taken from Wiki...
Wikipedia is a pretty cool source, but its NOT RELIABLE! Especially when asshats with an agenda like Sparky are always loose.
Trusting Wikipedia is like trusting the loudest screamer out on the street because you hear him best...
Do yourself a favour and search "mike sparks gavin" and "mike sparks usmc" on whatever search engine you prefer and see if what you come up with tells you anything.
This guy is a serious adherent to the "repeat it enough times and it become truth" paradigm.
Oh, and please sign up on the petition "for the widow"...
Quote:
If you want to, I could phone the American DoD tomorrow (Sunday's sleep-day) and ask them. Or would you rather I didn't quote such hilarious sources, and rather found someone reliable (please, mention some if you'd like)?
|
What now? You need my permission?
What will it tell you?
1; That its not its OFFICIAL nickname (nobody claims that...yet...).
2; wheter the individual answering subscribes to the "Gavin" mythos or not.
3; That they are busy and have better things to do?
Btw, "Gavin" or not, isn't this pretty OT little troller?