Strategia_In_Ultima said:
Win2k = mucho bad. Get XP.
In my experience, this has been the polar opposite from reality.
Strategia_In_Ultima said:
If you upgrade to XP, on the other hand, you would still get plenty of support, as Microsoft is still happily tinkering away at new service packs for XP, while the others are being left out in the deep freezer IIRC.
To me, the very few (non-bloat) things added in XP over win2k are not worth the cost of money to power the bits sustaining them. I can get far better free 3rd party applications to replace them.
Thermodyne said:
then look for a worm
Do you have a name of such a worm I should be looking for?
Some Wacko said:
Naw its not Win2k that is causing the problem, its Fyron and all that sticky stuff on the key boards. The PC just can't handle it any more. This is why we do not eat at our computers guys......
Speak for yourself man!
Atrocities said:
Win2k is basically NT and NT is not millennium! Millenium was a reboxed version of windows 98 with some elements of Win2k but that is as far as it went.
WinME also eliminated the last vestiges of legacy 16 bit architecture from the kernel, without bothering to prevent the installation of 16 bit drivers and 3rd party apps. This is the main source of problems in WinME, really...
=0=
Well, a hardware reboot occured somewhere in the 90% range while running memtest86, so I have removed the second stick of ram in hopes of it being the problem.