| 
				 Re: Soviet tank crew survival. 
 Man. What's wrong with DRG lately?
 Dealing with morons tends to do that. Kevin thinks
 that there are no interactions between the various
 ratings; this was revealed earlier by the autoloader
 debacle.
 
 Survivability is not how much of the crew survives; it's
 how often a unit can survive good solid hits that penetrate
 without going up in flames; to represent shells simply going
 in one side of a vehicle and going out the other side without
 hitting anything or exploding; it's happened in real life.
 
 EDIT: This has also raised some interesting questions in
 my head; should T-55/62 survivability be higher than
 T-64/72/80 survivability in the OOBs?
 
 The Russians actually switched to using uparmored and ERAed
 T-55s and T-62s in Chechyna because they didn't have the
 autoloader which placed the propellant in a location that
 was easily hit and penetrated, versus the more modern -64
 series tanks...I think they've rectified that problem
 somewhat in the latest T-90 models, but it still remains
 a weak point of the design.
 
			
			
			
			
				  |