[narwan]

You are being very silly here yourself. You can't even interpret your own test correctly!

As to the T10 being equal in ROF to the Abrams you've actually denied that twice in your own posts. You said the Abrams had 1 shot advantage while sitting still (first ROF difference). You also mentioned that while most Abrams had 2 shots left just like the T10's after moving their full allowance, some had one more. Sounds like a difference to me (nr 2).

But the silliest is that you had both tanks move their own full allowance and than compare them as if that was an equal comparison!
I've checked it (yep, did the test) and a T10 with speed 14 will get to an astonishing 24 mph on the road. An abrams with speed 22 will make it at 38 mph.
Congratulations, you've just showed that a much faster moving abrams has just slightly more shots left (averaging all your tanks) than a much slower moving T10.

But guess what happens when you move the Abrams at the SAME speed as the T10 (24mph on the road), in other words, make an equal comparison?

I do find it a bit baffling though. Here you go wanting to see an actual difference in ROF because of ammo type (2 part vs 1 part). As if making a distinction in ROF between different calibers isn't enough you now want to see 2-part ammo cause a measurable effect (we are talking short turns here, remember)? If we work down the calibre list and factor in all the different guns and their ammo types I guess we'd end up with 57mm guns having a ROF of 15 to 20.
Cause lets face it, any chance in the current situation with regards to the Abrams and T10's would ripple through all the OOB's and you'll be back soon enough with another unit to ***** about.