Thread: tanks vs rpg's
View Single Post
  #7  
Old September 8th, 2005, 06:41 PM

ranXerox ranXerox is offline
Private
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
ranXerox is on a distinguished road
Default Re: tanks vs rpg\'s

My mistake. It was PF97 and it hit to the side of M1A1ROC. Sorry. But now I wonder how weapon like PF97 which is not even at-weapon, blow up mbt? I think it's AP value is 9.. To my knowledge, PF97 is a thermalpressurebomb more than anything else..

And why PF97 has way more better ap-value than PF98, that uses bigger explosion(bigger heat-value) and they both are not at-weapons?
Reply With Quote