View Single Post
  #2261  
Old September 19th, 2005, 09:13 AM
Starfire512's Avatar

Starfire512 Starfire512 is offline
Private
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Starfire512 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: SE5, Tell Aaron what\'s on your Wish List

Better AI modding.

I've noted that one of the advantages that a player can use over the AI is single use planets. The AI tends to build multiple facility types on a single planet, including R&D on high resource value planets. Players on the other hand, tend to put one main facility type on a planet (say Minerals) and then load up on the bonus facilities (Robotic Factories, Mineral Scanners, etc.). This gives a much larger total production overall when you examine this on an empire wide scale. A poor resource planet, then is loaded with many R&D facilities.
Another AI problem is that the AI considers a tiny domed planet to be equivalent of a Huge non-domed planet. Thus, Default_AI_Planet_Types: "Percent of Colonies:" becomes fairly worthless as a method of tracking overall production balance to the empire.
If the AI could take a broader look at its facility building abilities, it would be better (Empire Wide: running low on minerals, where is the best place to build more -- but restricted by minimum mineral value). I think the AI could be made considerably stronger. Another thing that I often look at is "Am I plus or minus on the resources I'm taking in vs using?". This tells me whether I need to focus on resource production or R&D point production.
The key is that SpaceEmpires is first an economic game, and secondly a military game. Thus, if the economic abilities of the AI are inefficient, then the overall AI will be seen as weak as it just doesn't have enough ships to compete.
Reply With Quote