Re: The Council of Wyrms
What is the point of exalted positions, if you cannot abuse your power? Nobody would want them otherwise!
There are already some checks and balances, and far too many of them: Council had to agree to my being Chief Justice, and was aware of the full extent of powers granted to the office. Council may not override any of the rulings of the Court, for we rely on the very Covenant that gave Council its powers and legitimity.
Therefore, dismissing any duly nominated member of the Court without the assent of said Court is a direct violation of our prerogatives, and was ruled to be quite uncovenantionally in Pasha v. World, Maine v. France, Dawg v. State, and other similar cases.
Still, if you insist on check and balances, I might be able to give you a hand: I will send you the check you deserve as part of your dismissal clause, and I will throw a few balances in your general direction. I live to serve.
|