View Single Post
  #1436  
Old November 2nd, 2005, 09:40 PM
Jack Simth's Avatar

Jack Simth Jack Simth is offline
Major General
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,174
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Jack Simth is on a distinguished road
Default Re: OT: Narf has gone looney and wants to GM.

Quote:
Violist said:
Quote:
Jack Simth said:
So you could set up a Touch trigger, attuned to yourself and everyone currently in the party, and add a password for anyone you hand it to. You could even skip the password, and have it not trigger for anyone you specifically hand it to, and attune it to a specific list of individuals. I'd want the exact trigger-condition phrasing a bit in advance, though, so I can adjucate it, and warn you if some particular funciton isn't on the list of possibles.
Would this trigger condition work?
Quote:
If the object upon which the symbol is placed is touched, check to see if toucher is specifically sanctioned by the caster, either through means of a password or by the caster's willing presence. If toucher is not sanctioned, the spell is triggered. Otherwise, remain untriggered.
Hmm, hard to phrase those...
Quote:
can be based on a creature’s name, identity, or alignment, but otherwise must be based on observable actions or qualities
Quote:
Violist said:
Even my cat can tell the difference between someone wanting to be somewhere and not, and by D&D mechanics, she'd have the intellect of a trap (or thereabouts). It's not really very hard to tell, and generally, if someone is unconcious, it's either very special circumstances (tooth removal, etc) or they don't want to be there.
Ah, but a cat is Int 2; I think of spells more like computer programs (Int -, like most constructs). Willing is actually a very high-level concept, by definition existing in the mind of the person the person in question - which isn't observable (however, straining muscles are, as is rapid back-and-forth movement, a pinning condition, open eyes, wounds, et cetera; but the spell can't just assume that's the kind of thing you are looking for....). That clause is not valid for the spell. Replacing "Sanctioned" with "attuned" (definined in the spell - declared at casting) is valid, but the Symbol doesn't magically know who you have sanctioned or not, with another definition of the word.

Also, I'll want a specific list of those for whom you are attuning it when you cast the spell.
__________________
Of course, by the time I finish this post, it will already be obsolete. C'est la vie.
Reply With Quote