Re: Improvement proposal I - OP fire draining
I'm rather on Artur's side here.
Either the Camo team should claim that they don't think there is any problem with OpFire, but that's a hard stance to keep given than practically there *are* problems in 80% of the OpFire cases we see in SPMBT or SPWW2, else I would be glad to see the team have a more constructive approach than "it requires too much work/AI programming" and so on.
The "target type" ideas here are quite good - in fact that's how it works rather well in Combat Mission or EF/WF series. If the AI can't benefit of it because it's too long/difficult, we would at least solve the problem in pbem as jd38011 pointed out.
|