If "the PM site has facts and even has many world renowned structural engineers providing their expert opinions based upon facts that can and have been verified by both on site evidence, video tape evidience, scientific evidence, witness statements, construction record, design records, structural engineering reports, computer anyalists, and so so much more," why can't the NIST come up with an explanation for why WTC building 7 collapsed?
When Dr. Sunder of the NIST was asked why the fate of the building was barely mentioned in the final report, he replied "“But truthfully, I don’t really know. We’ve had trouble getting a handle on building No. 7.”
http://newyorkmetro.com/news/features/16464/index6.html
__________________
Click
here for "Hell No, We Won't Go" video.
Need an outlet for your sadistic impulses?
Join the IDF!
Click
here for the silenced side of the Mideast conflict (more
here). Remember the
USS Liberty and the Lavon Affair.
Click
here and
here to find out how close the George Washington Bridge came to being blown up on 9/11.
"For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all the iniquity and wickedness of men who unjustly suppress the truth." - Rom. 1:18