View Single Post
  #10  
Old November 27th, 2001, 01:20 AM

arthurtuxedo arthurtuxedo is offline
Corporal
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 103
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
arthurtuxedo is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Star Wars Mod - II (Sci-Fi Xover Mod)

quote:
Actually, trek does have fighters, they are shielded, they do go FTL, and they don't have full size M/ARCs.
Shuttlecraft are light fighters.
Just look at the dominion war (DS9).
There, they have the runabouts with torpedo launchers (medium fighter)
And the military designed-to-be-a-fighter fighters. (large fighter)

You don't actually need a Matter/Antimatter reactor (aka warpcore) to run warp drive, but it requires less fuel and is more compact (size:energy output) than the comparable Fusion reactors. Most ships don't carry enough fusion reactors to move at a decent warpspeed.
Shuttles only go warp 2 or so since they have smaller powerplants.

IMO, Trek vs Wars fighters would suffer worse than the capital ships.
Wars fighters are somewhat stronger than Trek fighters, and the Trek fighters can't use FTL attacks effectively on moving targets.
(I believe that the only chance Trek ships have against Wars capital ships would be "Warp Strafing", where they launch torpedoes at FTL speeds, and the enemy can't see them until they've gone past)

Shuttles are not fighters. As for Tac Fighters and especially Peregrines, well, you can call a boulder a pebble, but it's still a boulder. A tac fighter might be too small to be called a small cap ship, but it's way too big to be called a fighter. Heavy bomber maybe. A peregrine is hardly smaller than the Defiant.

quote:
Star Wars - develop more fully the very early techs. I don't think that the SW techs are really all that advanced,

Careful, we're trying to make a mod, not start a vs. debate.
quote:
I think that much of the 'late era' stuff we see in the SW movies is due to specialized development of a few key technology branches.

That's impossible. You can't say someone has extremely advanced weapons (for instance), but everything else is crap. If their weapons are super powerful, they need hull materials and shock absorbers that can take the recoil, you need reactors that can power them, etc. To paraphrase Mike Wong, if you gave Leonardo DaVinci the blueprints for a modern car and explained to him how it worked, he still couldn't build it because technology in a thousand other areas just isn't there.
quote:
That is to say, their movement rates are extremely high, but their combat movement is not nearly as high as the Star Trek ships.

That's true, Trek ships have higher sublight acceleration because they submerge most of the ship's mass in subspace using the warp drive.
quote:
They have developed excellent fighters, but personally I don't think the turbo-lasers
Reply With Quote