Quote:
the "infantry to armor cost disparity" IS lower in MBT than in WW2 which is the opposite of your claim for the two games
|
For that one example, perhaps. But in GENERAL, this is not the case.
But again, at this point, I'm not going to try and argue it. If you want to believe that infantry are more expensive relative to armor in MBT than thats fine. Perhaps I'm just playing 'incorrectly'.