Quote:
Meglobob said:
Quote:
Teraswaerto said:
Quote:
Meglobob said:
Vanheim/Hellheim are not out of balance. They are simply very, very strong nations early in the game or on small maps.
From midgame onwards those nations shrivel up and die rather easily.
|
I don't know why for example EA Vanheim would suck at mid or end game. Their magics are not bad. Air and Earth. Granted, they are capital only, but that doesn't make their magic power weak, and the troops are still deadly as raiders even if they can be beaten by high research magics.
It proves nothing that they have won no MP games we know of. There are so many variables at play there.
|
Teraswaerto here is Tyrants MP game winners so far, its really the only concrete evidence we after go about the balance of nations:-
.5 for joint win.
EA-
Caelum- 1
Sauromatia- 1
Tien Chi 1
MA-
Pythium 1
Ulm .5
Machaka .5
Man .5
Ermor 1
Vanheim 1
Jotunheim 1
Pangaea 1
LA-
Argatha 1
Mictlan 1
As you can see Hellheim and Vanheim have NO WINS in EA and 1 Vanheim win in MA. If Hellheim/Vanheim really are unbalanced they would be clocking up more wins.
|
Sorry but this states says who win the game but not how! It says nothing about alliances of several players to defeat one nation or equal things.
I never played vanheim/helheim in a mp game but i've some good tactics in mind with the glamour stealth troops. In my mp games i've defeated vanheim twice but the players used the vans as a simple (very strong) combat unit. They missed the point that this things are the best national stealth troops.