[Jazzepi]

WSzaboPeter said:
Okay. Please take a look at this picture and see how Jazzepi interprets truth.

I'm really sorry, but you would like to STOP other players game simply to solve something like a territory dispute? That is way unfair to other players.

I did not gave any attack orders this turn, but I think next turn I will set myself to AI. My forces are superior, and the only thing that keeps me from crushing you is the fact that I always obey the rules of the games, and for some reason this game had a rule that
someone can hide between a non agression pact and then invade... We both know that you are planning an offensive, maybe building a fort near my capital in this very minute, and I can't do a thing. That's why I will quit this game if this will not be solved.

First off, you should have never proposed a pact if you didn't understand the consequences of it which were that you aren't allowed to attack me if I don't invade your provinces. Now, I invaded some territory nearby yours that was neutral, and then you accuse me of "hiding behind a non-aggression pact". Well obviously, the point of a non aggression pact is that I can "hide behind it", just like you can "hide behind it". Right now the majority of my forces aren't anywhere near your border, they're out expanding in other places.

Secondly, everyone is *always* planning an offensive. If you aren't eventually planning on backstabbing your partners, you aren't playing to win. Sometime, in the future, because of the nature of the game you're going to have to attack people that were previously allies. I don't understand why you seem so surprised by this.

Third, and last, if you look at the above picture you can see a mountain range clearly between the neutral province I captured from neutrals and his capital. No province that I control, or captured, is next door to his capital. I could not see his capital when I took them, and did not know it was there. While the provinces that I hold are in a good strategic position, that's part of the reason I took them! So complaining that they put you in a bad position isn't a good point to argue why I shouldn't be allowed to have them!

I would just like to put a reminder out there that this is just a game! Being sneaky during diplomacy is part of the game, but I firmly believe that nothing I did was even a stretch of the NAP I signed in good faith.

Jazzepi