Hey, if I was Microsoft, I'd much prefer yet another anti-Microsoft rant instead of something dealing with the specific faults of the game in question... I mean seriously, how the heck do these reviewers even stay in business without the game industry suing them out the kiester? It's not really libel because (usually) what they say about the games is actually true, but you'd think someone at a game company somewhere would be able to hire a competent enough attorney to convince a judge otherwise...
