Quote:
calmon said:
Bug found! 
|
Excellent work!
Quote:
I were stupid not seeing it before. After some further tests i finally found the problem:
|
On the contrary!
Quote:
It all depends on your research!
|
I would say that that this was not at all an obvious dependency. I mean, maybe it would be obvious if you knew the architecture, and had access to the source code it might be obvious, but from a black box testing point of view, I think this was quite an excellent catch.
I would also say that this is a fairly huge bug, and in all likelihood you've made Johan's job a whole lot easier by tracking down the bug so specifically. Anyhow, that's just my 2 cents, but again, outstanding job!