[Managarm]

Very interesting analysis Max!

Having a look to the results from my newbie point of view, I expected better figures for Growth-3 due to a higher population in a long term basis.
In fact, Death-3 is slightly better in terms of accumulated income and breakeven turn, and it only has a 2% population penalty (roughly speaking) versus the Growth-3 case.

In some of my SP games I wrongly set Growth to 3 expecting a better income in the long run, but now I see those gains are just peanuts.
The lesson I've just learned it is not choose Growth-3 for a raw income bonus, and make a better investment for those 120 points.
Nonetheless, Growth-3 is still advisable for Nations with elder mages (Mictlan, Marignon, etc) or with supersized units like Giants and bulimic Demons (Niefelheim, Lanka, etc).
Does it make sense?