Quote:
tromper said:
But I feel sort of badly for Manuk anyway, as declaring a 'Yes!' to an obviously confused player regarding normal-ish diplomacy efforts seems rather inconsiderate and reserved for 'win at all costs' sorts of players, of which there are many. It would have been very easy to ask for clarification instead of just deluding the guy, but hey, just my opinion.
|
It's a one sided view of things.
Why do you assume he was *obviously* confused ??!!
When I received the "NAP ?" question, I was really confused. That was the first time I saw such kind of "NAP". I was pretty sure that not putting details or breaking condition was a way to backstab me later... A NAP can't just be an indefinite NAP or it's not one.
That's true, I did not ask for further details but he did neither... You should consider that. What were his true motives ? Did you ask yourself this question ?
Now it's easy to call for treason !
I had bad intentions and I do think he had some too.
I will not defend myself anymore. I told what I had to tell and how I lived this little story.
No ! I forgot this one : I'm not either a 'win at all costs' sort of player... And I find this rather offending.
Now let's hunt some mermaid !