Re: Sophistry - Random Nations, Early Age (Sign-up
Huh? You're trying to turn this into me being upset about something?
...
Let's rewind a little.
I've had fun with what little I've had, trying to postpone my imminent demise while killing people in Helheim's provinces (ha ha, that's a couple less provinces for him to use for blood slaves later on!). I'm not upset about the fact that Marverni's weak in early game, I actually already like the nation. And as I see it, the more I can spread the lub of Marverni the better. At the point I made the whole "who wants half of my gems?" thing, I also had so few of them that cutting it up to 1/4ths would've made the amount completely laughable. This is what you have a problem with. However, this is completely supported by the game itself.
You say you are upset about me saying that I sent my gems out to people who were selected on first come first served basis, which is somewhat random, sure. Truth is, you got upset only after you learned the number of the gems (hundred zomg), and are making it damn obvious to me that you would've been perfectly happy with me being completely silent about the gems after asking about who'd want them the way I did, which is quite stupid from my point of view, although it seems to be the norm in the game. Ignorance is bliss. As I said, I've taken your (strange) point and will never ever say a word about possible sendings of gems to anyone when I lose again.
Indeed, from this little convo we've been having I think it's YOU who should be complaining to the devs about a built-in feature that's making you get all upset. MY gems, MY choice to give them away the way I want. NOT YOURS.
|