Re: Petar\'s \"Range Weapons\" flamebait
Yeah how silly of him to overcomplicate things by using the same factors the game does to calculate damage. Let's just forget the game, it makes the math too complex.
Your argument that arbalests are hands down the best mundane missile weapon now appears to be "Arbalests do the most damage per hit". Great. I think we can safely say that this is no longer up for debate, because you're the only person arguing that Arbalests are the best and your argument doesn't deserve a sensible reply (you'd ignore or dismiss it anyway, judging by your response to Tuidjy).
I was going to run some ingame tests with crossbows and arbalests, behind a wall of Ulmish heavy infantry, vs various enemies to see which one was generally more useful. But now I can see there would be no point, because Arbalests do the most damage per hit. Heh.
|