View Single Post
  #7  
Old October 8th, 2007, 08:17 AM
PlasmaKrab's Avatar

PlasmaKrab PlasmaKrab is offline
Captain
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: 40km from the old frontline
Posts: 859
Thanks: 0
Thanked 15 Times in 7 Posts
PlasmaKrab is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Surface to Air Missile Inconsistencies

Suhiir, did you rerun your HE values since last time we went over the MANPADS issue?
Since that point, my Stinger all have 5-2-5 as WHS-HEP-HEK. BTW where did you get that Stinger warhead efficiency should rise over the years?

Regarding the accuracy ratings, I have stuck to the following (The early Stinger being my 100 benchmark model for comparison purposes):
Code:
Model       Name                Acc.  WHS  HEP  HEK  MinRange MaxRange EW
FIM-43 Redeye 60 4 2 3 ??? 90 0
FIM-92A Stinger 100 5 2 5 4 80 2
FIM-92B Stinger 100 5 2 5 4 96 3
FIM-92C Stinger-RMP 110 5 2 5 4 96 5
FIM-92E/F/H Stinger-RMP Block1 120 5 2 5 4 120 8
FIM-92J (?) Stinger-RMP Block2 135 5 2 5 4 160 12


Regarding the heavier SAMs, as I said, the warhead scale is fuzzier. For now I have settled for 1kg -> 1HEK and WHS=3.5+M(wh)/3. Gives the following, not tested yet or expanded to other countries:
Code:
Model        Name        Acc.  WHS  HEP  HEK  MinRange MaxRange EW
MIM-23 HAWK 80 22 5 54 40 203 3
MIM-23B I-HAWK 90 28 5 74 30 207 6
MIM-23C HAWK-III 105 28 5 74 30 209 10
MIM-104A Patriot 125 32 5 91 160 214 9
MIM-104C PAC-2 150 32 10 84 60 234 10
MIM-104D PAC-2/GEM 150 32 10 84 60 234 15
MIM-104E PAC-2/GEM+ 165 32 10 84 60 234 18
MIM-104M (?) PAC-3 180 32 70 40 60 (?) 202 20

Tell me if you find more workable scales for HE and acc/EW values.
Reply With Quote