Re: Why Kailasa, Bandar Log, and Patala NEVER WIN
To be short, blunt, and to the point:
You have no basis at all for extrapolating from the given data an unequivocal statement on _anything_. Having just had a test where I was required to calculate confidence intervals for several questions, I can tell you that you have no idea how unsupported your claim is.
Your statement is not supported by the evidence. If you made a statement like, "The Ape nations have not won YET because people haven't figured out a way to compensate for their PD being unable to stop raiders," you might get a bit more agreement.
You are making an obviously flawed argument from the subject line on. I would suggest a basic course in statistics before you try to make this or similar claims.
|