Quote:
Then dont, the missing units cant be built by cross attaching, otherwise I wouldnt have bothered posting.
|
Nice ad hominem.
Quote:
Re: Light Mortar accuracy
Hi James
Yes I think that is how most players play them. Really they are best
used as the "centrepiece" of a coy defensive position, If you have
say just an inf coy being assaulted by a infantry battalion then
these little fellows can actually make quite a difference. Once
armour is introduced, or in a mobile battle they are much harder to
employ.
Regards Chuck.
--- In SPWW2@yahoogroups.com, "hogrider18" <bikerjay@f...> wrote:
> Hay Chuck, When I have had German support troops I always turned
> off their 5cm mortar's and ONLY use them when I could DIRECTLY
> target an enemy unit. They seem to do well against troops moving
> in the open, and can help suppress dug in troops enough for other
> squads to rush in for a close assault. At one time I used them like
> arty using a spotter to fire them, but they had such a limited
> range and accuracy that I stopped doing that.
> biker
|
Cake and eat it.....
This is just one post of an entire acrimonious thread where the whole direct/indirect mortar problem was discussed in depth. The results of that horse flaying exercise are known. If "...most players..." don't have a problem playing them direct fire only then there isn't a problem - for most players.
Quote:
Quote:
PatG said:
Oh and good luck with the masses of 1 pt Chinese armour. 
|
This says it all really, Russians Pat Russians.
|
You said nothing about Russians though the '39 date is a bit of hint. So if it's Russians, you really are screwed. Good luck.