View Single Post
  #9  
Old February 26th, 2008, 05:33 AM

kevineduguay1 kevineduguay1 is offline
BANNED USER
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Goldsboro, North Carolina
Posts: 172
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
kevineduguay1 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Aircraft weapons

More goodies from Global Security.

"During the late 1950s, the primary material used for kinetic energy, armor-piercing projectiles was tungsten carbide. When first fielded, tungsten carbide represented a quantum improvement over its nearest competitor, high carbon steel. Its higher density (approximately 13 gm/cc) gave it superior penetration performance against existing armor targets. With the advent of double and triple plated armor in the 1960s, however, tungsten munitions showed a tendency to break up before penetrating the layered armor. This deficiency spurred the development of new alloys and materials capable of defeating any armored threats."

Navy stuff from Global Security.

" The Navy made the decision based on live fire tests that showed that tungsten met the Navy's performance requirements while offering reduced probabilities of radiation exposure and environmental impact. It should be noted that the "soft" targets the CIWS was designed to defeat-anti-ship missiles at close range-are far easier to destroy than "hard" targets like tanks. Substantial stocks of DU ammunition delivered prior to that date remain in the inventory."

One more from some other site.

" Additionally, DU penetrators exhibit significant adiabatic shear band formation. During impact, fractures along these bands cause the tip of the penetrator to continuously shed material. This erosion maintains the tip's conical shape. Other materials such as unjacketed tungsten tend to deform into a less effective rounded profile, an effect called "mushrooming"."

Good night!
Reply With Quote