[llamabeast]

Well I can't enforce it as such. I'm just stating that's the idea for this game - NAPs are meant to be inviolable. In most other games that is never stated. Most players assume it, but occasionally someone doesn't, and violates an NAP since they believe they are entirely within their rights to do so. This often causes bad feeling.

The alternative would be to play with a Machiavellian style, in which NAPs can be broken and diplomacy is a subtler affair. This could be very fun too, and I plan to run a game explicitly like that at some point. But for this one (assuming no objections) we will go with the NAPs-should-not-be-violated model.