Quote:
Xietor said:
In no way can K's belief that Player B taking provinces from player c, in a valid war between the 2 nations, be considered a hostile act to nation A. Again a nap is no guarantee that Player B is going to make sure you always own everything within your present borders.
If another nation comes along and rolls player A back, how is that B's fault? And if C attacks b as well, should B not do everything in his power to hurt C?
|
Ah, but by taking those provinces with your forces you are preventing me from popping in forces to take them back(since I'd have to fight your forces instead of PD or his forces. I also can't pincer from behind. Essentially, you are fortifying my enemy's position against me and attempting to claim that the NAP means that I can't take those provinces back.
I'm losing more because of your actions, and that breaks the spirit of the NAP in the same way that putting up a "harmful to everyone" Global enchantment would, or a direct attack.
Expect an attack if you try to abuse the wording and intent of a pact.