Quote:
DRG said:
quote]KraMax said:
Why we in this theme discuss our OOB?
|
Why ? Because you're the one claiming the SU-122 as we have modeled in the Russian OOB did not exist with the 122mm M30 L22 gun and that we should "clean" that weapon from the OOB but if we "clean" that weapon from the OOB something must replace it in the vehicle.. yes ? So I took a little peek at your OOB and lo and behold you give your SU-122 the same gun as the IS-2M the IS-3, the IS-4 , the T-10 , the T-10B and the ISU-122 in from 1946 to the end of 1954 so I ask you to justify that with proof and the Russian Wikipedia entry isn't very good "proof". I figured since you posted a list of 93 mostly trivial "errors" in our OOB you wouldn't have a problem with my questioning your work. You really don't consider that MAYBE we don't always think your info was passed down on stone tablets. The range of the RCL's is just one example.
So.. show me information on this other weapon the post war SU-122's are supposed to have used. A photo would be a good start especially one of an SU-122 carrying the gun from a T-10
Don
[/quote]
Which I have specified proofs - normal and they are. A problem only in that that you cannot clean in general SU-122 with gun M30 from game. Also it is not necessary to ask from me proofs of presence at SU-122 guns D-25T - I have already written to you that I will study this question and in need of our OOB I will make changes. But from the middle of 50th years appears SU-122-54 is the fact. But in this theme I did not write about identity of gun D-25 and M30.
Range of shooting RCL - I have presented to you to proofs of the table of shooting of these tools which are made together with these guns and stand out to soldiers for trainings. But you have ignored them. In this case iron - but you them do not accept my proofs.