Quote:
calmon said:
Sorry K for me you're no longer trustworthy.
You bring up a test with an output which happens only in a rare case.
You missed completely to upload the scenario BEFORE the battle so everyone can test it. I'm sure you knew its rare.
I disprove your so called "test" and you still argue round and round.
Well, i'm sure i can do 100 more tests and you still write silly answers with more or less lies in it. You recall me on one person in dom2 who also denied all facts and was immune to arguments.
|
Wow. It's another thread that devolves into personal attacks.
I'll explain myself exactly once:
I put up a few test games to show that MoD could be beaten by killing the phantasms. That is proved beyond any doubt, and has caused the buglist to be altered to fit the truth.
I did not set up a fail-proof MoD counter for people to test and play with. I had no intention of doing so, which is why I ran exactly four games using four strategies and I posted three of them (the unposted one wasn't a win on the first try, so I ditched it rather than fiddle with the exact set-up I'd need to win).
I had no intention of dragging in the old argument of "is a BE + Retreat broken?" in this thread. I know that lots of people value it to an insane degree (much higher than I do) and they think it's an unbeatable tactic.
And I don't care anymore.
I've shown that small armies with a few mages can beat it. It doesn't matter if it happens rarely if you use the small army and a few mages in my test games and more often with a larger army and more mages.
It has been proved possible. My goal is accomplished, and fighting with you guys over whether you think BE/MoD + Retreat is broken is not worth my time because it's only a matter of opinion on both sides.
My only question is this: you can't disprove that it is not possible, so what exactly are you doing? At best, you can only prove that I should have used a few more mages.