View Single Post
  #4  
Old August 19th, 2008, 10:04 AM

thejeff thejeff is offline
General
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,327
Thanks: 4
Thanked 133 Times in 117 Posts
thejeff is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Cataclysmic Dragons

I like the idea of more impressive dragons, though I don't share all your prejudices about dragons.
Don't blame Tolkien for talking dragons. He was working from mythological source. Fafnir spoke in the Norse myths. I can't remember if the dragon in Beowulf did.
Chinese versions of dragons often talked and played a very different role than medieval European ones. That's probably also where the idea of dragons taking human form comes from.

And from a literary point of view, a villain who can talk and has a personality is more interesting than a simple destructive monster, however powerful.

As for dragons being demonic, to the medieval Christian anything supernatural was either divine/angelic or demonic. If you're going to classify dragons as demons based on that, everything magical should be
demonic. Including many of the non-human races and most summons.


And despite the scoffing here, Tea with the Black Dragon is a really good book. I read it a long time ago. Highly recommended. Except maybe for those who want their dragons only as destructive forces of nature. Even the dragons get bored with that after thousands of years.
Reply With Quote