Quote:
Originally Posted by chrispedersen
From my own perspective, a non agression treaty means you will take no actions to harm the person with whom you have a treaty.
So for example, If I am about to invade a territory - and you conquer it specifically to prevent it - you have violated the nap.
Territories 55, 70, 46 were all kailasa's when I invaded 55.
Words otherwise simply aren't the truth.
|
I have never heard of such an interpretation of the phrase "non-agression", for what it's worth. Attacking a third party hardly seems like an aggressive action.