Re: Inviolate NAP, First Draft
Yes, a 'standard' NAP as such doesn't exist, when I wrote 'standard' I meant that one person says "NAP 3?" and the other says "ok", and details are worked out as the game goes on.
I think it's reasonably fair to call this standard because most people don't have the time or inclination to lay out every detail before each treaty. Common sense has to substitute for legalese in this case.
I actually think it's not such a bad idea to have specific treaty rules laid out somewhere. But I guess my main point is that it's mostly relevant to people who already exercise common sense anyway, and it isn't really going to stop any disagreements or arguments arising.
I reckon that's because of the nature of the game (ie. there can be only one!).
|